Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02511
Original file (BC 2014 02511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 				DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02511

 							COUNSEL:  NONE

							HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her separation date be changed to August 2006 and her grade to be 
corrected to airman first class (E-3).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She did not receive her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or 
Discharge from Active Duty, until September 2012 and has been 
trying to get the errors corrected through various sources.  She 
does not know the source of the errors but would simply like 
resolution.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 7 Sep 04, the applicant initially entered the Air Force 
Reserve.

On 19 Dec 04, the applicant was honorably released from active 
duty, for completion of initial active duty training, in the grade 
of airman basic (E-1) and was credited with 3 months, and 12 days 
of active service.  At this time, the member had not completed her 
first full term of service.

On 1 Jan 06, the applicant was promoted to the grade of airman 
first class (E-3).

On 6 Feb 10, the applicant’s commander recommended her for 
administrative discharge for unsatisfactory participation pursuant 
to AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air 
National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members.

On 28 May 10, the discharge authority approved the applicant’s 
separation from the Air Force Reserve.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an 
error or an injustice with regards to the applicant’s DD Form 214 
for the period 7 Sep 04 through 19 Dec 04.  In accordance with 
AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, to receive a DD Form 214 [to 
reflect the grade of airman first class (E-3), as of 1 Jan 06] the 
applicant must have completed 90 days or more consecutive active 
duty days or 1 day or more in support of a contingency operation.  
After a review of the applicant’s orders and points summary, no 
evidence exists to justify correcting her separation date or 
grade.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluations was forwarded to the applicant 
on 10 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.

?
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-02511 in Executive Session on 22 Apr 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 Jul 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, ARPC/DPTS, dated 11 Sep 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Oct 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05357

    Original file (BC 2013 05357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05357 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM) and his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect such. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his deployment during the period 5 Jun 04 to 23 Aug 04 in support of Operation Iraq Freedom (OIF), where he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02382

    Original file (BC 2014 02382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS indicates DAFSCs are based on a member’s position, not experience level in accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, paragraph 1.4.8 (Atch 1). ARPC further recommends that the applicant submit her request, along with the appropriate documentation to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05007

    Original file (BC 2013 05007.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05007 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be issued a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflective of his continuous honorable reserve service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01672

    Original file (BC-2012-01672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of memoranda of support from personnel at the National Guard Bureau and the Headquarters Air Force Surgeon General’s office, and six OPRs. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03552

    Original file (BC 2012 03552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03552 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect her release from active duty as 8 Nov 05, instead of 4 Oct 05. On 4 Oct 05, the applicant was relieved from active duty and issued a narrative reason for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02877

    Original file (BC 2014 02877.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02877 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military records be corrected to include his Air Force Reserve time. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05148

    Original file (BC 2013 05148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter with attachments prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is insufficient evidence of an error or an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02257

    Original file (BC 2014 02257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, Retired or separated personnel are not eligible to apply for correction through the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB); therefore, they must apply to the AFBCMR. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03487

    Original file (BC 2014 03487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03487 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be credited with a satisfactory year of Reserve service for the retention/retirement (R/R) year 17 Jan 11 to 16 Jan 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03024

    Original file (BC 2014 03024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of the certificate awarding him the MSM first OLC for his outstanding service for the period 15 Feb 10 through 27 Feb 14. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the...